"I have read through the manuscript and I am highly impressed with the editorial work."

************************************************************

"I apologise my fault missing a periodical visit to The Annals of Medical Entomology web site. Unmentionable. Thank you again and be sure I will send you new manuscripts.

Best regards."

************************************************************

Re. Anns. Med. Ent. 10 (1) : 1-13.

‘Nitric oxide: cytotoxic and cytoprotective? Rationalization of its influence on malaria gametocyte exflagellation’ by A.W. TaylorRobinson & C.G.C. Ramsey.

The reprints of this article arrived safely today. I am very happy with the quality and will certainly recommend the journal to my colleagues and collaborators. I am also impressed by the website, which should give you welcome exposure.

Thank you for your kind concern about my health. I have now resumed my duties and hope to contribute further to your journal in the future.

*****************************************************************

"The quality of editing is very good. I very much like the editing format. You have made contributions to The Annals of Medical Entomology."

****************************************************************

"The quality of editing on our papers was very good. We like the present format of the Annals."

2. Professor of Medical Entomology, Department of Parasitology & Medical Enomology,Army Medical Research Institute of Nanjing, Military Region, Nanjing, People's Republic of China 210005

****************************************************************

"We submitted the papers for publication in the Annals and we were very much satisfied with the editorial standards. The final print is very fine. The publication of the Annals must be continued."

****************************************************************

"My article was peer reviewed very satisfactorily. Editing was quite prompt. There is no specific journal in medical entomology in India. It must be continued. I would like to advise to hold seminar / symposium / conference on medical entomolgy with attraction to young scientists by offering them awards, prizes, citations and momento."

**************************************************************

"The standard of correspondance is very good. All letters were replied promptly. Editing on my papers was of a good quality and positive comments were given. The format of the Annals is good and no change should be made at this stage."

*************************************************************

"In my opinion, the quality of the letter is good and responsible.My letters were replied very promptly. The quality of editing done on my paper is better. The Chief Editor worked on my paper effectively and promptly. The format of the Annals is appropriate. I feel it should be continued."

*************************************************************

"My papers were nicely edited by your editorial board. The present form of the Annals serves the needs of the medical entomologists of the world. I like the format of published papers."

*************************************************************

"The quality of letter correspondance by the Chief Editor is highly appreciable/superb. The editing is methodological and scientific and the format of the editorial comments was standard. The present editorial review is upto mark and sincere effort is being made by Chief Editor and the editorial board."

************************************************************

"I am satisfied with the quality of the letter correspondance. The quality of editing is of international standard. I would suggest you to increase the number of the editorial reviewers from other countries not represented. I also suggest the number of issues in each year be increased to a minmum of four issues a year."

************************************************************

************************************************************